Q: What is the optimum pH range for the hydroponic fertiliser solutions?
A: The optimum pH range is dependent on several factors, such as the nature of the crops grown. The typical pH range used by farmers is around ~6.5.
Q: Based on the presentation, impeded growth of crops was observed in the trial involving the use of dewatering centrate mixed with commercial nutrient solution. What types of vegetables have been tested? Does the degree of impedance vary among different types of vegetables?
A: PUB/SFA has previously conducted crop tests on Xiao Bai Cai (Chinese Cabbage) and Lettuce, which are some of the most commonly consumed vegetables in Singapore. PUB has not studied the degree of impedance among different crop types. However, we observed noticeable differences in the crops grown using dewatering centrate mixed with commercial nutrient solution and the crops that are grown purely using commercial nutrient solution.
Q: What is the typical pH of the dewatering centrate?
The pH of the dewatering centrate based on six months of routine sampling is approx. 7.7.
Q: Is PUB currently producing struvite? If yes, could struvite be used as a source of phosphorus to develop a soluble fertiliser for hydroponics purpose?
A: PUB's Used Water Treatment Operations currently does not recover struvite as a main product. Previously, PUB had tried crystallising struvite from the dewatering centrate stream for hydroponics applications, but observed that it had limited solubility in hydroponic solutions. We will consider any cost-effective solutions that can dissolve struvite in the hydroponics solutions without affecting the optimal pH required for farming operations. The costs of producing struvite and dissolving struvite (if any) will need to be accounted for in the techno-economic analysis.
Q: Are there any requirements for the solution to be set up in an indoor or outdoor environment?
A: Both outdoor and indoor setups are acceptable. Solutions that can be set up in an indoor environment will be more aligned with future plans to advance towards vertical or multi-tier farming systems.
Q: What is the scale of the pilot required for this challenge?
A: We recognise that there are several scopes of work that could be covered in the proposed project. This could include the development of the phosphorus recovery process and the crop tests that needs to be performed in order to validate the use of the resulting product as a fertiliser for hydroponics purposes.
Applicants will need to propose the scope of the pilot, considering the budget limitations due to the pilot funding that is capped at S$250,000.
Q: Is PUB open to looking at phosphorus recovery from upstream treatment processes instead of the listed waste streams?
A: The concentration of phosphorus in the upstream processes are typically too low for the return-on-investment (ROI) to be justified. While PUB is open to explore new technologies to recover phosphorus, the ROI should be justified.
Q: Is PUB open to solutions that involves the addition of chemicals in the upstream process?
A: In Singapore's context, biological-based wastewater treatment methods is largely preferred to conventional chemical precipitation methods for minimising OPEX associated with sludge disposal and chemical costs.
Q: For the techno-economic analysis for the phosphorus recovered, what is the quantity considered?
A: Quantity estimates of the available phosphorus for the different waste streams can be found in the table listed under the Background and Current Practice section. We suggest referencing the figures provided in the table for your techno-economic analysis.